非数额型盗窃罪的认定
【摘要】随着社会经济的快速发展，盗窃罪公正合理的定罪量刑越来越重要。《刑法修正案（八）》对盗窃罪的定罪量刑标准进行了进一步完善，在以前盗窃罪的标准上又增加了”入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、扒窃”的非数额的定罪情节，实现了刑法保护机能和社会保障机能。本文旨在通过对非数额型盗窃罪和传统的盗窃罪进行对比，对他们的内涵和外延分析界定，对这几种盗窃行为并存时的量刑提出合理化建议。刑法修正案八在原有的盗窃罪的基础上增加了三种新的盗窃行为：入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、扒窃。这一改变扩大了刑法的打击范围，体现了刑法惩罚和预防犯罪的刑罚目的，更有利于保护人民群众出行的安全和保障人权。
刑法修正案(八) 对盗窃罪作了重要修正,除保留原有数额较大的情形,又增加多次盗窃、入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃和扒窃四种入罪情形,这四种新的入罪情形即非数额型盗窃。本文通过分析非数额型盗窃立法的缺陷和“充分适用说”的不合理性,提出在现行司法境况下,应严格界定非数额型盗窃的入罪情形,把握相关的定罪标准,做到有限适用。
关键词：非数额型 盗窃 适用问题 法律研究
[abstract] With the rapid development of social economy, it is more and more important to convict and sentence theft fairly and reasonably. The Criminal Law Amendment (8) further perfects the conviction and sentencing standards of theft, and adds the non-amount conviction circumstances of "household theft, armed theft and pickpocketing" to the previous standards of theft, thus realizing the functions of criminal law protection and social security. This article aims at comparing non-amount theft with traditional theft, analyzing and defining their connotation and extension, and putting forward reasonable suggestions on sentencing when these kinds of theft coexist. Amendment 8 of the Criminal Law adds three new types of theft on the basis of the original crime of theft: household theft, armed theft and pickpocket. This change enlarges the scope of the criminal law, reflects the purpose of punishment and crime prevention, and is more conducive to protecting the safety of people's travel and protecting human rights.
The Criminal Law Amendment (8) has made important amendments to the crime of theft. In addition to retaining the large amount of the original case, there are four new cases of theft: multiple theft, household theft, armed theft and pickpocket. These four new cases are non-amount theft. By analyzing the defects of the legislation of non-amount theft and the irrationality of the theory of "full application", this paper points out that in the current judicial situation, the criminalization of non-amount theft should be strictly defined, and the relevant conviction standards should be grasped to achieve limited application. *
Key words: legal research on the application of non-amount theft
目录
一、非数额型盗窃罪的含义 3
二、对三种新型盗窃行为的内涵与外延进行分析界定 4
（一）入户盗窃 4
1.入户盗窃入罪的理由 4
2.入户盗窃中“户”范围的界定 4
（二）携带凶器盗窃 5
1.携带凶器盗窃入罪的理由 5
2.凶器范围的理性界定 5
（三）扒窃 6
1.扒窃行为入罪的正当化分析。 6
2.扒窃犯罪的基本特征。 7
三、非数额型盗窃罪量刑 7
1.量刑起点的选择 7
2.入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、扒窃并存时的量刑 8
3.这三种盗窃与多次盗窃及普通盗窃并存时的量刑 8
4.注意《刑法》第十三条的应用 8
四、结语 10
参考文献: 10
参考文献:
[1]张智辉《刑法理性论》北京大学出版社 2006年版 第241页
[2]陈兴良《相似与区别:刑法用语的解释学分析》载《法学》2000年第5期
[5]张明楷:《盗窃罪的新课题》载于《政治与法律》第2011年第8期,p2-13
[6]关于盗窃罪的既遂标准,理论上有接触说、转移说、隐匿说、失控说、控制说(取得说)、失控加控制说。在我国理论界及司法实务界,失控说是主流学说。
[7]李翔:《新型盗窃罪的司法适用路径》,载于《华东政法大学学报》2011年第5期( 总第78 期),p113-120
[8] 张明楷:《盗窃罪的新课题》载于《政治与法律》第2011年第8期,p2-13
[9] 李翔:《新型盗窃罪的司法适用路径》,载于《华东政法大学学报》2011年第5期( 总第78 期),p113-120
